Jaguars coach Mike Mularkey said on Tuesday that running back Maurice Jones-Drew is skipping OTA’s because he wants a new contract.

“I’m in the coaching end of these matters, and I’ve talked to him about football and what I can do on the field and in the locker room,” Mularkey said according to Vito Stellino of the Florida Times-Union.

Neither Jones-Drew nor his agent, Adisa Bakari, have said publicly that he wants an extension, but there’s been much speculation because his contract has been surpassed by several running backs.

A team spokesman said there have been no discussions about a contract extension for Jones-Drew.

View full post on NFL Gridiron Gab

From TMZ

Tim Tebow is definitely down with Jesus … but he ain’t down with “MY Jesus” t-shirts — and he’s threatening legal action because he says a website is illegally using his name to sell the merchandise.

TMZ obtained the cease and desist letter Tebow’s attorneys sent to cubbytees.com last month — in which they claim “The Merchandise makes it appear as if Mr. Tebow actually endorses Cubby Tees and its products.”

Interestingly, the tee shirts in question do not use Tebow’s image or name — but instead spell out “MY Jesus” using the colors and font of his new team … the NY Jets. In fact, the website clearly states, “This fun design is not officially endorsed by New York’s backup quarterback or the Son of God, but plays off the themes of Tebow’s faith and his new team.”

Still, Tebow’s attorneys are demanding the site stop “any use of Mr. Tebow’s name and/or likeness” — and according to Cubby Tees, Tebow already successfully petitioned eBay to remove the tees.

The shirt makers tell TMZ they aren’t backing down, and actually sent a response to team Tebow … saying the design “shares nothing with Mr. Tebow except for promotion of a common Lord and Savior.” The shirts are still for sale.

View full post on NFL Gridiron Gab

If you’re going to kick off a viral marketing campaign and plan on using a popular viral platform as the cornerstone of that campaign, you better actually have that platform’s permission. Otherwise, you’re going to have a problem. So why White Castle would use “JibJab” in its advertising message on Facebook and Twitter without ever partnering with JibJab is a true mystery.

You can’t try to spread your message virally by piggybacking on another viral brand and expect them not to find out about it. And this wasn’t just a mistake. White Castle used the JibJab name in a video it made, then tweeted “5 minutes of @JibJab #fame?” and referenced JibJab in the copy of its Facebook advertisements. It also apparently depicted cartoon characters that looked like the JibJab mascots.

JibJab, like any good company in this day and age, monitors all references to its name and when it saw White Castle plastering it everywhere, it wasn’t amused. The company, which rose to stardom in 2004 when viral videos were still a new thing and its parody musical about the presidential campaign captured the nation’s attention, has filed a lawsuit to block White Castle from using the JibJab name.

[via paidContent]


JibJab sues White Castle over viral campaign is written by Mark Raby & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.



View full post on SlashGear

Sometimes, the best way to deal with a problem is to pretend that it doesn’t exist. At least, that’s the impression put across by former NFL running back Ricky Williams when he discussed the recent concern about concussions in football with ESPN’s Dan Le Batard. Williams, who played for the New Orleans Saints, Miami Dolphins, and Baltimore Ravens during an 11-year in which he gained over 10,000 rushing yards, retired in February. And when it comes the possible effects of the game as he enters a new phase of his life … well, Williams can’t really be bothered.

“I have no idea, and I’m not a really big fan of the way the NFL is handling concussions,” Williams said on Tuesday. “Maybe I’m stupid or whatever, but if I got a concussion, and I could see straight and I could carry a football, I’m not telling anybody … From what I’ve seen, [the NFL is] all about prevention — but can you prevent a concussion? I mean, you can definitely have safer helmets, and I had what I think was the safest helmet when I played, and I think you can definitely pay more attention. But ultimately, it’s about the players. And I think all this attention given to prevention — it seems like they haven’t done anything, because they don’t believe they can actually treat a concussion.”

When Le Batard said that he didn’t understand Williams’ statement (put us in that camp as well), Williams elaborated.

“Most of the research around concussions is to find that 100 percent of football players have brain trauma. Well — I don’t want someone to tell me that, right? I don’t want someone to tell me that, because if it’s a ‘doctor’ (Williams used air quotes when he said the word ‘doctor’), I don’t buy it.”

The now incredulous Le Batard asked Williams to clarify his stance — did he believe that there is not a link between football and concussions?

“I don’t buy it. I’m only speaking from my personal experience, because I haven’t allowed myself to buy it, and I haven’t been affected. Yes, I’m aware that football is a rough sport, but instead of saying, ‘Oh — I’m doomed to brain trauma,” I said, ‘What can I do about it?’ And I just started taking care of my body. I found people, places, and things that really helped me — again, I don’t know what’s going to happen to me in 10 years, but I look at the other things I’ve learned about, and the way I see the world.

“And to me, it’s like — okay, yes. If we’re going to spend six months brutalizing our bodies, I said, ‘That makes sense. I’m going to spend six months taking care of my body. I started to equip myself with tools. I started practicing yoga, and I started learning some hands-on healing stuff. I found really good chiropractors and massage therapists, and I found that I was able to peel off layers of trauma on my body. I actually move better now than I did [when I played].”

When asked about the science of brain trauma, Williams passed it off. “Science is the deity, but should it be?”

I’m not about to tell Ricky Williams how to deal with the effects of football — he’s certainly taken many more violent hits than I have, and he appears to be none the worse for wear. I’m also in the camp that believes in the positive effects of a holistic approach. The “mind over matter” stuff works to a degree, and maybe Williams is just on a higher plane with it. And if it allows him to bypass the sometimes horrific results that happen when you bang your helmeted head into another helmeted head … well, good for him.

I just hope he isn’t on the outside looking in from a medical perspective when he’s 44 years old instead of the 34 he is now.

View full post on Shutdown Corner – NFL – Yahoo! Sports

Given today’s economy, any recent college grad would consider themselves lucky to have two viable options. Andrew Sweat, former linebacker at Ohio State, does have two options, and he’s choosing to be a 1L instead of an LB.

He had a chance to make the Cleveland Browns roster as an undrafted free agent, but instead declared on Twitter that he was heading to law school.

Fair enough. Sweat did sustain a concussion in college and if that, plus the ongoing concern surrounding football-related head injuries, has persuaded him that the NFL isn’t a good option, then it doesn’t seem like it’s an unreasonable decision. Not that it would be my place to call it reasonable or unreasonable.

Some did criticize, though. Eli Mystal, a former lawyer and current editor of legal blog Above the Law, took Sweat to task over bailing on the NFL, saying the decision was “the biggest mistake of his life.” Deadspin followed suit.

Sweat responded, again via Twitter.

I suppose that does add another layer of sense to things. His dad can get him a job in the legal field, so unless Andrew Sweat was raised in an “Andrew has two daddies” situation and the other one is Pat Shurmur, then the law thing is probably more of a slam dunk. It would be hard to fault a guy for taking the sure thing.

Of course, I’d say the same thing about following his dream to the NFL, too. But maybe that’s just it ‒ maybe the NFL isn’t his dream. Maybe he’s like Judge Petrovsky and law was his destiny.

In any case, good luck to him. Everybody’s got choices to make about their future, and it seems like Andrew Sweat is in a pretty sweet position, no matter which path he chooses. Maybe one day he’ll get to help defend the NFL from the onslaught of concussion-related lawsuits it’s facing.

More sports news from the Yahoo! Sports Minute:

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
Shine: Beach volleyball star Kerri Walsh-Jennings almost lost out on Olympic dream
Quarterback Kellen Moore trying to prove himself again at Detroit Lions minicamp
Game-changing moment of the week: Joey Votto’s walkoff grand slam

View full post on Shutdown Corner – NFL – Yahoo! Sports

Rocket EV

You won’t be driving away in this by the end of 2012, but you can expect it to smoke the EV competition. Shawn Lawless and his Rocket drag bike managed to hit just over 200 miles per hour on . We could eke out a few more words about the 14.2-kWh battery, but we’d prefer to let the video do the talking — it’s right after the break.

Continue reading One-man Rocket EV hits over 200 mph in under 7 seconds (video)

One-man Rocket EV hits over 200 mph in under 7 seconds (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 08 May 2012 10:03:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Autoblog  |   | Email this | Comments

View full post on Engadget

Google to be fined by US over Safari breach

The United States Federal Trade Commission will fine Google for its breach of Apple’s Safari web browser security, Bloomberg reported on Friday. The Internet giant is currently negotiating with the Commission over an acceptable fine, which could amount to tens of millions of dollars. The fine would be the first time the FTC has ever punished a company for violating Internet privacy safeguards. Google in February was found to be bypassing the privacy settings of millions of unknowing Safari users by using a special code to install cookies on a user’s computer, even when such actions were supposed to be blocked by the browser.

Read

View full post on BGR: The Three Biggest Letters In Tech

A look into the trends of salespeople in Verizon Stores has discovered that the company may be training its employees to tout the benefits of 4G LTE on Android so that it makes the iPhone pale in comparison, with some sales personnel even being quoted as calling the iPhone “outdated.” CNN found a notable number of users who had stories of going into a Verizon store wanting to buy an iPhone but being convinced to buy something like a Droid Razr instead.

Reporter David Goldman wrote, “I had 10 conversations with Verizon sales representatives in New York stores, on the phone, and in online chat sessions, asking about my options for a new smartphone.” “Here’s what I found: Next time you walk into a Verizon store looking to buy a smartphone, expect the hard sell on a 4G Android device,” he continued.

He said that in 100% of his discussions, the sales reps pointed him toward the Droid Razr, the Droid Razr Maxx, or the Lucid – all of which are powered by Verizon’s high-speed LTE network. Not once did he receive the iPhone as a recommendation. In response to Goldman’s report, Verizon released a statement saying, “Our sales force’s mission is to ensure customers are familiar with our product line and to match the customer with the right device to best meet their needs.”

[via CNN]


Verizon hard sells LTE Android over iPhone says report is written by Mark Raby & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.



View full post on SlashGear

A New York man claims Apple charged him twice for the same song on iTunes and then refused to give him his money back.

Now New York resident Robert Herskowitz wants to represent everyone in the country in the same boat. In a complaint filed in San Francisco, Herskowitz wants Apple to pay back everyone who was allegedly charged for double downloads. He also wants special damages and for Apple to change its refund policy.

The case appears to hinge on the terms of service for the iTunes store which requires all users to agree to its no refund policy.

The iTunes rules provide for a refund only if an item doesn’t download or if there are technical problems.

Herskowitz’s complaint stems from December of 2010 when he downloaded 22 songs from iTunes. He claims that he was billed twice for one of them, paying $2.58 rather than $1.29 for “Whataya Want from Me.” The song is by an American Idol runner-up.

Herskowitz claims he wrote to Apple to recover the $1.29 but simply received an automated reply that described the no refund policy.

The lawsuit is based on breach of contract and on California consumer protection laws.

Apple is also facing a separate iTunes related class action brought by parents over so-called “bait apps” — apps that are free but on which children can rack up bills through in-app purchases.

Apple did not immediately reply to an email request for comment.

You can view the complaint at Justia which was first to report it.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.




src='http://ads.gigaom.com/show/rss/'
alt=''
border='0'
/>

View full post on Apple

A New York man claims Apple charged him twice for the same song on iTunes and then refused to give him his money back.

Now New York resident Robert Herskowitz wants to represent everyone in the country in the same boat. In a complaint filed in San Francisco, Herskowitz wants Apple to pay back everyone who was allegedly charged for double downloads. He also wants special damages and for Apple to change its refund policy.

The case appears to hinge on the terms of service for the iTunes store which requires all users to agree to its no refund policy.

The iTunes rules provide for a refund only if an item doesn’t download or if there are technical problems.

Herskowitz’s complaint stems from December of 2010 when he downloaded 22 songs from iTunes. He claims that he was billed twice for one of them, paying $2.58 rather than $1.29 for “Whataya Want from Me.” The song is by an American Idol runner-up.

Herskowitz claims he wrote to Apple to recover the $1.29 but simply received an automated reply that described the no refund policy.

The lawsuit is based on breach of contract and on California consumer protection laws.

Apple is also facing a separate iTunes related class action brought by parents over so-called “bait apps” — apps that are free but on which children can rack up bills through in-app purchases.

Apple did not immediately reply to an email request for comment.

You can view the complaint at Justia which was first to report it.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.




src='http://ads.gigaom.com/show/rss/'
alt=''
border='0'
/>

View full post on Apple

 Page 1 of 14  1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last »