Tag Archives: into
The market for keyboard-equipped phones may be on the wane, but don’t tell that to Ryan Seacrest — the American Idol host is convinced that messaging mavens need real buttons. To that end, he’s jumping into hardware and launching the Typo Keyboard …
Engadget RSS Feed
While turbocharging and supercharging may be nothing new in the automotive industry, motorcycle engines are almost always naturally aspirated. But even that’s beginning to change. At the Tokyo Motor Show last week, two major Japanese companies showed off new forced-induction motorbike engines.
Kawasaki rolled in with a supercharged four-cylinder motorbike engine. It offered little in the way of details, disclosing only that the turbine blades were developed in-house to withstand the heat and vibration of spooling up at motorbike speeds.
Suzuki is taking a different approach, however. Its Recursion concept bike packs a turbocharged 588cc two-cylinder engine with a turbocharger and intercooler. The compact package churns out just under 100 horsepower and 74 pound-feet of torque, packaged into a motorbike that weighs just 384 pounds dry.
It’ll be interesting to see how this trend develops and how the reliance on forced-induction might change the character of the motorbikes in which they’re installed. While we wait to see where this goes, you’re invited to scope out the stock images of the Recursion concept in the gallery above and our live shots from the Tokyo show floor in the gallery below.
You likely won’t know Germany’s Gigaset unless you’ve bought one of its cordless phones, but you may want to take notice now that the company is launching its first tablets. Both the 8-inch QV830 and 10-inch QV1030 have relatively upscale aluminum shells and run stock Android 4.2, all the while targeting very different audiences. The QV1030 is the high-speed flagship with a 1.8GHz quad-core Tegra 4 processor, a 2,560 x 1,600 display, 16GB of expandable storage and both 8-megapixel rear as well as 1.2-megapixel front cameras. The QV830 aims at a more frugal crowd with its 1.2GHz quad-core MediaTek chip, 1,024 x 768 screen, 8GB of expandable storage, 5-megapixel rear camera and 1.2-megapixel front shooter. Both slates should reach Germany in early December, starting at €199 ($ 271) for the QV830 and jumping to €369 ($ 502) for the QV1030. There’s no word of an American launch, although we’re not counting on it when Gigaset doesn’t have much of a footprint in the US.
Filed under: Tablets
X-Men: Days of Future Past has received a real-world tie-in via The Bent Bullet, a promotional website and video that weaves X-Men mutants in with a JFK conspiracy theory, blending the real and fictional in a quasi sort of alternative history genre getup. The video, which we have for you after the jump, summarizes the […]
(Credit: Tiny Speck)
Once upon a time, a beautiful game called Glitch that delved into the minds of ancient giants enthralled the small but passionate number of players who took the time to explore its deep, artistic stories.
Glitch was developed by Tiny Speck, a San Francisco startup led by Flickr co-founder Stewart Butterfield. At its peak, 150,000 players enjoyed the game, not least because its developers had invested immense amounts of time in its complex and imaginative art.
Iin 2009, CNET reported exclusively on the creation of Glitch, which in the end didn’t make it as a commercial enterprise. In 2012, Tiny Speck pivoted and now publishes Slack, the team communication tools it built while developing the game. That was a fitting end for a Butterfield project, given that Flickr was created as a side element of Game Neverending, a game that never went anywhere. That story is part of Silicon Valley lore.
Now, Tiny Speck has announced that it has decided to donate the entire Glitch art archives — except for the game’s logo — … [Read more]
Markus ‘Notch’ Persson: The mind behind Minecraft (Q&A)
Hacking is NSA’s ‘growth area,’ Times says in agency profile
Poll: Where will Twitter’s stock trade six months from now?
Funhouse of Horror 2013: Top 5 free scary games to download
Obama administration vows ‘tech surge’ for HealthCare.gov
DENVER – For all the talk of the great Chiefs-Broncos showdown on “Sunday Night Football,” the Broncos had it pretty easy.
Kansas City, the final undefeated team in the NFL, was dealt its first loss (pop that champagne, you 1972 Dolphins) in a 27-17 defeat to the Broncos at Sports Authority Field. Even though the Chiefs competed hard, the Broncos had the game in control from the first quarter on.
The Chiefs offense didn’t create much, Kansas City took very few chances (including a punt from Denver’s 41 in the fourth quarter when they were down 14 points), the defense didn’t sack Peyton Manning, and that’s a terrible combination against the NFL’s highest scoring team.
Manning wasn’t even that great, completing 24-of-40 passes for 323 yards, but that was more than enough. The Broncos were content to play a Chiefs-like game and run the ball a lot, and two touchdowns from Montee Ball were a big difference. The Broncos seemed like they wanted to limit Manning’s exposure to Kansas City’s pass rush, especially on a gimpy ankle. And when the Chiefs did get to come at Manning, they rarely put a hand on him. Denver’s oft-criticized offensive line had a very good night, and Manning was quick to get rid of the ball.
The hardest hit Manning took all night was on a tackle, and it was a huge one for the Broncos. In the first quarter Manning was the only Broncos player between Chiefs linebacker Derrick Johnson and the end zone after Johnson scooped up a Ball fumble, and Manning got Johnson down. The next play, Broncos linebacker Danny Trevathan forced a fumble by Kansas City’s Anthony Sherman on a short catch and Denver recovered. Manning hit Julius Thomas for a 9-yard touchdown on the next drive to give Denver a 10-0 lead, and the Broncos were never in serious trouble after that.
The Broncos moved into a first-place tie with the Chiefs at 9-1. The two teams meet again in Kansas City in two weeks, and the Broncos’ line should have a much tougher time protecting Manning with the Arrowhead Stadium crowd making a lot of noise.
But on Sunday night, there was never any real doubt about the outcome.
- – - – - – -
Just when you thought nothing could uglier than Zubaz pants, the Pittsburgh Steelers brought back their throwback uniforms.
Pittsburgh’s players were clothed in uniforms to honor their 1934 team against the Detroit Lions on Sunday. The team wore these same throwbacks in 2012 to celebrate their 80th season in the NFL. Vintage clothing is often stylish. But these uniforms, which are a combination of “Where’s Waldo?” meets Dr. Seuss in a paint store, definitely rank high on the hideous scorecard.
However, the players seem to be warming up to them:
“It’s a change up,” offensive tackle Marcus Gilbert told Steelers.com this week. “Wearing jerseys like this is meaningful. It represents the past and great history of the Steelers organization. We will wear it with pride. We will wear it with swag.”
Are these the worst of the NFL throwbacks? Judge for yourself:
- – - – - – -
Believe it or not, not all home movies were recorded using an iPhone. There are still quite a few camcorders and other video recording devices still being used to play back older home movies. Not to mention the fact that many among us have years of video clips on our hard drives that we would like to organize and view on our Apple TVs. Doing so may now be easier than you think.
Apple added a new feature to the Apple TV this fall called iMovie Theater that makes viewing your home movies on your Apple TV a whole lot easier. Fortunately iMovie Theater is not limited to showing off movies that were recorded using Apple devices. Almost any video source can be used and uploaded to the iMovie Theater. You do however have to go through either the iOS or the OS X version of iMovie to get there. Here’s how.
Drag and drop simplicity on OS X
The OS X version of iMovie still supports importing movies taken from tape based camcorders. Even if you are no longer using your ancient tape-based camcorder, it is refreshing to know that you can still access your old home movies from the latest version of iMovie. Once you do have your movie files on your Mac, all you need to do is just launch the latest version of iMovie for OS X Mavericks. By default, you don’t even need to modify your iCloud account settings to do this.
If you are not interested in going through the process of importing your favorite movie events, starting a new project, trimming and transitioning your movie clips into the masterpiece it deserves to be, you don’t have too. You can bypass that entire process and use iMovie as a means to directly access your iMovie Theatre files stored in iCloud. Simply select the Theater tab of iMovie and drag and drop your individual movie files from the Finder directly to iCloud. iMovie will make all of the necessary transitions to support the various devices that have access to iMovie Theater for you. Within moments your video clip will be available on all of your Apple devices running iMovie, including your Apple TV.
Share from iMovie not Photos on iOS
If the source of the movie clip is an iOS device, then your best path for getting your recorded movies onto your Apple TV is through the iMovie app from the iTunes app store. Unfortunately you cannot use the Photos app directly to access the iMovie Theatre, you must go through the iMovie app.
When you first launch the iMovie app, it will instantly find all of the movie files that you have taken on your device. There is no need to import. And just like with the iMovie app for OS X, you do not have to create a project or edit the movie file in any way to upload the movie clip into iMovie Theater. Simply select the clip and tap on the share icon. Choose iMovie Theater and shortly your movie clip will again be accessible from all of your Apple devices running iMovie, including your Apple TV.
iPhone 5S and the Slo-Mo effect
One of the fun new features of the new iPhone 5S is its ability to shoot high-definition video at 120 frames per second. This allows one to apply a slow motion effect to their videos to smoothly play back certain segments of the video at a more normal 30 frames per second. The challenge for many has been in preserving exactly which segment of the video is to play back in the slower 30 frames per second.
The confusion stems from the fact that the Photos app is actually applying an effect to the video. Then when you share the video directly from within the Photos app, it will actually render the edited video with the applied effect before uploading it to the shared service you select. The problem with getting the edited version of the original movie into your iMovie Theater is that you cannot share directly from the Photo app on iOS to the iTheater: you must go through iMovie. The Photos app actually preserves the originally recorded movie file without alterations.
Adding the Slow Motion effect back to movie files using iMovie
So when you access the original video clip directly from within the iOS version of iMovie, or if you off load your videos to your Mac and access the original files using the OS X version of iMovie, you will notice that they are unedited versions of the movie without the slow motion effect being applied. One option you have is to simply re-apply the slow motion effect from within iMovie before sharing it to your iMovie Theater.
- Create a new movie project and add the desired movie clip to the project (import the movie file first if using the OS X version of iMovie).
- Split the video clip where you want the slow motion effect to begin, and again a second time where you want it to end.
- Select the clip in the middle and apply the slow motion effect to just that clip.
There are advantages that this techniques has over jumping through hoops to try and get the edited version out of the Photos app in the first place. These alternatives involve sharing to alternate services first or emailing the movie clip to yourself. The first advantage is that you are working with the original movie file, not a rendered or edited copy. The second is that with iMovie, you can add multiple slow motion effects to a single video clip, not just one. That is something that the Photos app simply cannot do.
Other sharing options for the Apple TV
The one downside to sharing your home movies to your iMovie Theater is that unlike Photo Stream, the shared movie clips stored in iCloud count against your iCloud file storage quota. If you are already backing up your iPhone and iPad to your iCloud account in addition to sharing app data with your Mac, you may be very close to using up your entire 5GB of free space.
One option you have is to share the movie to your iCloud Photo Stream and access it from there. This does require a little bit of setup first in your iCloud account settings, and will use up local storage space on each of your devices. Additionally only the last 1,000 shared photos and videos of each Photo Stream will be accessible. That’s not exactly an option for providing access to some of your older, less viewed home movies.
A second option utilizes your iTunes library. With it you can set up Home Sharing on your Mac to provide access to all of your home movies over your Wi-Fi network. To view the shared files you will need to set up Home Sharing on your iOS devices as well as your AppleTV. While each of these home movie to AppleTV sharing solution has their limitations, iMovie Theatre seems to be the easiest to use out of the box.
Related research and analysis from Gigaom Research:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.